StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles 
20/06/18Antennebureau: Resultaten
12/06/18Geluid van diverse RF str
15/06/18The 25% Revolution—How
07/06/18Bees, Birds and mankind D
07/06/18Is your high blood sugar
04/06/18Verstouwbare waterafstote
31/05/18Fatal collision? Are wire
29/05/18Researcher Explains How E
Berichten Nederland
21/06/18Leeuwarden: straling 5G n
18/06/18‘Nederland wordt digita
15/06/18Duurzaam Antennebeleid We
15/06/1816 juni: Internationale E
09/06/18Buurt in Kerkdriel wil ze
Berichten België
16/06/18Scherpenheuvel-Zichem: Be
14/06/18Tommelein laat straling d
Berichten Internationaal
19/06/18Oostenrijk: Wordt uitzend
07/06/18Oostenrijk: Ärztekammer
04/06/18The roll out of 5G wirele
03/06/18Top mobile phone firms wa
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
28/05/18Stralingsarme werkplek
28/05/18Ervaring in Denemarken
23/05/18Energieverbruik 2 keer zo
21/06/18Absorption of wireless ra
17/06/18Metabolic and Genetic Scr
12/06/18The human skin as a sub-T
Veel gestelde vragen
13/05/17Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
01/06/18Wetgeving hoogspanningsli
15/05/18Brit dad sues Nokia for u
02/03/18Formal Complaint to the E
15/06/18Stem voor plan voor een w
24/05/18Lezing in Westerhoven: Sm
25/04/18Workshop: EHS en omgaan m
10/09/17Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
28/05/18Elektromagnetische velden
23/05/18Mail naar Brandpunt over
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
USA: Stellingname Artsenorganisatie diametraal tegenover Nederlandse Gezondheidsraad.    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Berichten Internationaal

USA: Stellingname Artsenorganisatie diametraal tegenover Nederlandse Gezondheidsraad.
maandag, 16 april 2012 - Dossier: Internationale berichten

De American Academy of Environmental Medicine, opgericht in 1965, is een toonaangevend internationaal instituut van milieuartsen. In een position-paper roepen zij op tot een onmiddellijke stop op de uitrol van slimme meters en reductie van de blootstelling aan niet-ioniserende straling. Daarbij beroepen zij zich op de causaliteitscriteria van Bradford-Hill naar aanleiding van in vitro, in vivo en epidemiologische studies die duidelijke aanwijzingen geven voor de negatieve gezondheidseffecten van niet-ioniserende straling, zoals van mobieltjes, wifi en slimme meters. Onderstaande tekst geeft een gedegen overzicht van de uit onderzoek naar voren komende zeer schadelijke gevolgen van radiofrequente straling. Verplichte literatuur voor het Kennisplatform Elektromagnetische Velden en de Commissie EMV van de Nederlandse Gezondheidsraad:

Bron: American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) 12 april 2012

Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields

Effect on Human Health

For over 50 years, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has been studying and treating the effects of the environment on human health. In the last 20 years, our physicians began seeing patients who reported that electric power lines, televisions and other electrical devices caused a wide variety of symptoms. By the mid 1990's, it became clear that patients were adversely affected by electromagnetic fields and becoming more electrically sensitive. In the last five years with the advent of wireless devices, there has been a massive increase in radiofrequency (RF) exposure from wireless devices as well as reports of hypersensitivity and diseases related to electromagnetic field and RF exposure. Multiple studies correlate RF exposure with diseases such as cancer, neurological disease, reproductive disorders, immune dysfunction, and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

The electromagnetic wave spectrum is divided into ionizing radiation such as ultraviolet and X-rays and non-ionizing radiation such as ultrasound and radiofrequency (RF), which includes WiFi, cell phones, and Smart Meter wireless communication. It has long been recognized that ionizing radiation can have a negative impact on health. However, the effects of non-ionizing radiation on human health recently have been seen. Discussions and research of non-ionizing radiation effects centers around thermal and non-thermal effects. According to the FCC and other regulatory agencies, only thermal effects are relevant regarding health implications and consequently, exposure limits are based on thermal effects only.1

While it was practical to regulate thermal bioeffects, it was also stated that non-thermal effects are not well understood and no conclusive scientific evidence points to non-thermal based negative health effects.1 Further arguments are made with respect to RF exposure from WiFi, cell towers and smart meters that due to distance, exposure to these wavelengths are negligible.2 However, many in vitro, in vivo and epidemiological studies demonstrate that significant harmful biological effects occur from non-thermal RF exposure and satisfy Hill's criteria of causality.3 Genetic damage, reproductive defects, cancer, neurological degeneration and nervous system dysfunction, immune system dysfunction, cognitive effects, protein and peptide damage, kidney damage, and developmental effects have all been reported in the peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Genotoxic effects from RF exposure, including studies of non-thermal levels of exposure, consistently and specifically show chromosomal instability, altered gene expression, gene mutations, DNA fragmentation and DNA structural breaks.4-11 A statistically significant dose response effect was demonstrated by Maschevich et al. , who reported a linear increase in aneuploidy as a function of the Specific Absorption Rate(SAR) of RF exposure.11 Genotoxic effects are documented to occur in neurons, blood lymphocytes, sperm, red blood cells, epithelial cells, hematopoietic tissue, lung cells and bone marrow. Adverse developmental effects due to non-thermal RF exposure have been shown with decreased litter size in mice from RF exposure well below safety standards.12 The World Health Organization has classified RF emissions as a group 2 B carcinogen.13 Cellular telephone use in rural areas was also shown to be associated with an increased risk for malignant brain tumors. 14

The fact that RF exposure causes neurological damage has been documented repeatedly. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability and oxidative damage, which are associated with brain cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, have been found.4,7,15-17 Nittby et al. demonstrated a statistically significant dose-response effect between non-thermal RF exposure and occurrence of albumin leak across the blood-brain barrier.15 Changes associated with degenerative neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) have been reported.4,10 Other neurological and cognitive disorders such as headaches, dizziness, tremors, decreased memory and attention, autonomic nervous system dysfunction, decreased reaction times, sleep disturbances and visual disruption have been reported to be statistically significant in multiple epidemiological studies with RF exposure occurring non-locally.18-21

Nephrotoxic effects from RF exposure also have been reported. A dose response effect was observed by Ingole and Ghosh in which RF exposure resulted in mild to extensive degenerative changes in chick embryo kidneys based on duration of RF exposure.24 RF emissions have also been shown to cause isomeric changes in amino acids that can result in nephrotoxicity as well as hepatotoxicity.25

Electromagnetic field (EMF) hypersensitivity has been documented in controlled and double blind studies with exposure to various EMF frequencies. Rea et al. demonstrated that under double blind placebo controlled conditions, 100% of subjects showed reproducible reactions to that frequency to which they were most sensitive.22 Pulsed electromagnetic frequencies were shown to consistently provoke neurological symptoms in a blinded subject while exposure to continuous frequencies did not.23

Although these studies clearly show causality and disprove the claim that health effects from RF exposure are uncertain, there is another mechanism that proves electromagnetic frequencies, including radiofrequencies, can negatively impact human health. Government agencies and industry set safety standards based on the narrow scope of Newtonian or ''classical'' physics reasoning that the effects of atoms and molecules are confined in space and time. This model supports the theory that a mechanical force acts on a physical object and thus, long-range exposure to EMF and RF cannot have an impact on health if no significant heating occurs. However, this is an incomplete model.

A quantum physics model is necessary to fully understand and appreciate how and why EMF and RF fields are harmful to humans.26,27 In quantum physics and quantum field theory, matter can behave as a particle or as a wave with wave-like properties. Matter and electromagnetic fields encompass quantum fields that fluctuate in space and time. These interactions can have long-range effects which cannot be shielded, are non-linear and by their quantum nature have uncertainty. Living systems, including the human body, interact with the magnetic vector potential component of an electromagnetic field such as the field near a toroidal coil.26,28,29 The magnetic vector potential is the coupling pathway between biological systems and electromagnetic fields.26,27 Once a patient's specific threshold of intensity has been exceeded, it is the frequency which triggers the patient's reactions.

Long range EMF or RF forces can act over large distances setting a biological system oscillating in phase with the frequency of the electromagnetic field so it adapts with consequences to other body systems. This also may produce an electromagnetic frequency imprint into the living system that can be long lasting.26,27,30 Research using objective instrumentation has shown that even passive resonant circuits can imprint a frequency into water and biological systems.31 These quantum electrodynamic effects do exist and may explain the adverse health effects seen with EMF and RF exposure. These EMF and RF quantum field effects have not been adequately studied and are not fully understood regarding human health.

Because of the well documented studies showing adverse effects on health and the not fully understood quantum field effect, AAEM calls for exercising precaution with regard to EMF, RF and general frequency exposure. In an era when all society relies on the benefits of electronics, we must find ideas and technologies that do not disturb bodily function. It is clear that the human body uses electricity from the chemical bond to the nerve impulse and obviously this orderly sequence can be disturbed by an individual-specific electromagnetic frequency environment. Neighbors and whole communities are already exercising precaution, demanding abstention from wireless in their homes and businesses.

Furthermore, the AAEM asks for:

•An immediate caution on Smart Meter installation due to potentially harmful RF exposure.

•Accommodation for health considerations regarding EMF and RF exposure, including exposure to wireless Smart Meter technology.

•Independent studies to further understand the health effects from EMF and RF exposure.

•Recognition that electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a growing problem worldwide.

•Understanding and control of this electrical environmental bombardment for the protection of society.

•Consideration and independent research regarding the quantum effects of EMF and RF on human health.

•Use of safer technology, including for Smart Meters, such as hard-wiring, fiber optics or other non-harmful methods of data transmission.

Submitted by: Amy L. Dean, DO, William J. Rea, MD, Cyril W. Smith, PhD, Alvis L. Barrier, MD

Voor het originele artikel met diverse hyperlinks en uitgebreide literatuurlijst zie: .

Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer