StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles 
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
03/10/18LED: Onderzoek naar LED-v
01/10/18Voorlichting voor wie nie
Artikelen
19/10/18Prof. Pall's Response to
18/10/18USA: Greenbank, het dorp
12/10/18THE PHYSIOLOGICAL AND ENV
10/10/18COMPILATIE: Maatregelen v
01/10/18Expert waarschuwt voor on
01/10/18Relatie tussen hoogspanni
Berichten Nederland
20/10/18Stadspartij Den Helder be
15/10/18Met 5G fors meer antenne-
13/10/18Raad Lingewaal niet akkoo
10/10/18Elektrostress - Milieuaa
09/10/18Mobiele telefoon verboden
Berichten België
03/09/18Waar staan de UMTS (3G) e
23/07/18Brusselse overheid tekent
Berichten Internationaal
21/10/18China bans mobile phones
19/10/18The 'Phonegate Scandal' m
10/10/18COMPILATION of measures t
10/10/18Cuba: Microwave Weapons A
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
17/10/18Ziek door straling, RTL l
01/10/18Dilemma? Baantje met stra
01/10/1827 jaar, elektrosensitief
Onderzoeken
10/10/18Diplomats' Mystery Illnes
06/10/18Low-intensity EMF induce
28/09/18Variation in temporal rel
Veel gestelde vragen
13/05/17Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
21/10/18Reconnu victime d’un ac
27/09/18Juridisch café VVM over
25/09/18WMO: Succesvolle praktijk
Oproepen
22/10/18Op maandag 22 oktober wor
17/10/18Gezocht: deelnemers aan k
15/10/18Lezing “(Geen) Wifi op
Folders
10/09/18Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
12/10/18Geplaatst in Eindhovens D
02/10/18St. EHS brief naar Tweede
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
Call for Truly Protective Limits for Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz)    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Berichten Internationaal

Call for Truly Protective Limits for Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz)
dinsdag, 09 oktober 2018 - Dossier: Internationale berichten


Bron: e-mail van de IEMFA organisatie
9 okt. 2018

Dear Scientists, Medical Doctors and NGOs

The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) issued draft Guidelines on July 11, 2018 for limiting exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). These guidelines are unscientific, obsolete and do not represent an objective evaluation of the available science on effects from this form of radiation. ICNIRP’s opinion and guidelines are unscientific and protect industry, not public health.

New truly protective guidelines are needed. We ask the United Nations, the World Health Organization, and all governments to support the development and consideration of medical guidelines, that are independent of conflicts of interests in terms of direct or indirect ties to industry, that represent the state of medical science, and that are truly protective.

Please read the entire call in the enclosed document:
www.iemfa.org/wp-content/pdf/EMF-Call-2018-10-30.pdf

We invite you to support this call for new science based protective guidelines for exposure to non-ionizing radiation.

This call to sign is open to scientists and/or physicians, and non-governmental organizsations (NGOs).

Please respond before: October 30, 2018

For scientists and/or physicians: please give name, title, organization (if applicable), city and country.
Respond to: lennart_hardell@hotmail.com

For NGOs: please give name of organization, contact person, and country
Respond to: mona@stralskyddsstiftelsen.se

Please mark your response: EMFcall

This call will be officially launched November 1, 2018

Yours sincerely,
Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD
The Environment and Cancer Research Foundation
Örebro, Sweden


Nogmaals de link
www.iemfa.org/wp-content/pdf/EMF-Call-2018-10-30.pdf
en het begin van de tekst:

ICNIRP’s opinion and guidelines are unscientific and protect industry, not public health

In order to protect the public and the environment from the known harmful effects from electromagnetic fields (EMF) we ask the United Nations, the World Health Organization and all governments not to accept the ICNIRP guidelines. They are not protective, rather they pose a serious risk to human health and the environment since they allow harmful exposure to the world population, including the most vulnerable, under the unscientific pretext that they are “protective”.

Zie voor de verdere tekst bovenstaande link.


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer