StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles 
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
05/02/18Voorlichting voor wie nie
23/01/18Meetspecialisten, afsc
Artikelen
21/02/18Noppies introduceert tege
18/02/18Can Cell Tower Radiation
14/02/18Vaccins: een veiligheidsv
11/02/18Autisme: New CDC Statisti
09/02/18De Volkskrant: Leven met
08/02/18Skepsis en de Vereniging
Berichten Nederland
16/02/18Blogs Hugo Schooneveld (v
15/02/18Mogelijk toch 5G-netwerk
15/02/185G: Nederlandse overheid
09/02/18Haarlemmers stappen naar
06/02/18Foto's: Ziek van Straling
Berichten België
14/02/18Stralingsoverlast door ze
13/02/18Strenge stralingsnormen b
Berichten Internationaal
21/02/18Engeland: smart meters -
17/02/1818 child smart watches fa
16/02/18Duitsland: Tewlekom - waa
15/02/18USA: SpaceX mag van FCC-v
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
09/02/18Burostoel met smart activ
15/01/18Ziekmakende ervaringen me
12/01/18Soms is tinnitus geen tin
Onderzoeken
21/02/18Elektromagnetische velden
15/02/18Effects of electromagneti
07/02/18NTP: High Exposure to Rad
Veel gestelde vragen
13/05/17Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
23/01/18Reeks publicaties op juri
23/01/18Juridisch advies en begel
19/01/18Afspraken voor beterere t
Oproepen
21/03/18Gratis informatiebijeenko
17/03/18Cursus straling meten voo
03/03/18Lezing: Wat doen elektrom
Folders
10/09/17Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
20/02/18Voorbeeldbrief Gemeentera
11/02/18Open brief aan KPN na ond
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
The Effects of Precautionary Messages about EMF's from Mobile Phones and Base Stations    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Onderzoeken

The Effects of Precautionary Messages about EMF's from Mobile Phones and Base Stations
donderdag, 07 juli 2016 - Dossier: Algemeen


Bron: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27163281
Risk Anal. 2016 May 10. doi: 10.1111/risa.12634. (Epub ahead of print)

The Effects of Precautionary Messages about Electromagnetic Fields from Mobile Phones and Base Stations Revisited: The Role of Recipient Characteristics.

Boehmert C 1,2, Wiedemann P 3, Pye J 3,4, Croft R 2,5.

1 Department of Science Communication, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany.
2 Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
3 School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
4 Healthy Brain Ageing Program, Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
5 Centre for Health Initiatives, Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

Abstract

Precautionary messages have been shown to increase recipients' threat perceptions about radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) emitted by mobile phones and mobile phone base stations. The current study explored the interplay of variables on the side of message recipients with this effect. The individual difference variables of interest were gender, trait anxiety, personal need for structure, and personal fear of invalidity. Furthermore, the study determined whether the increased threat perception is accompanied by emotional distress. A total of 298 university students answered a survey after reading either a basic text about RF-EMFs or a text including precautionary information. Linear multiple regression with interactions analyses showed that the effect of precautionary messages differed for people with different levels of trait anxiety. How trait anxiety was related to the effect of precautionary messages in turn depended on participants' gender. Personal need for structure and personal fear of invalidity were mostly unrelated to the effect of precautionary messages. Regarding participants' emotional distress, we found no difference in state anxiety scores between those participants who received precautionary information and those who did not. The findings show that the effects of precautionary messages on threat perception depend on individual difference variables such as recipients' trait anxiety and gender. Also, the fact that precautionary communication did not result in heightened state anxiety challenges the assumption that precautionary messages induce fear or anxiety.

© 2016 Society for Risk Analysis.

KEYWORDS:

EMF; individual differences; precaution; risk communication; risk perception


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer