StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
29/04/16Laptop warning, safe dist
26/04/16MICROWAVE WEAPONRY'S USE
Artikelen
03/05/16Lloyd’s of London Insur
26/04/16COMPILATIE: Maatregelen v
26/04/16DE FYSIOLOGISCHE EN MILIE
26/04/16Smart Meter Dangers, Who
24/04/16The Truth About Men’s I
24/04/16Korea: Crossed eyes, bent
Berichten Nederland
02/05/16‘Gezondheid Tweede Kame
01/05/16Tweede brief naar alle ge
20/04/16Elektrosmog De effecte
20/04/16Westfriesgasthuis: kwalij
18/04/16Amsterdam: Zendertjes opg
Berichten België
09/03/16Almaar meer werknemers he
05/02/16Perk: Ouder plaatst zelf
Berichten Internationaal
01/05/16Israel: Nieuwe video ''Ho
30/04/16Duitsland: Grundschüler:
28/04/16Duitsland: Stuttgart besc
26/04/16COMPILATION of measures t
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
25/04/16Elizabeth Plourde's story
07/04/16EHS: klachten verminderen
05/03/16Huilbaby? Modem (router u
Onderzoeken
03/05/16LTE Electromagnetic Field
27/04/16Mobile phone and heart ra
20/04/16The role of electromagnet
Veel gestelde vragen
02/05/16C2000, TETRA en algemene
22/08/15Vakantie? Witte zo
Juridische informatie
21/03/16USA: Berkeley Cell Phone
14/03/16USA: Proces tegen Fay sch
15/01/16GGD: brief met mogelijke
Oproepen
28/05/16Basiscursus ‘Meten van
21/05/16Lezing - 'Gezondheidsrisi
25/04/16Milieu- of gezondheidskla
Folders
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
26/10/15Brochures, folders, websi
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
16/04/16Brief met klacht naar de
20/02/16Voorbeeldbrief voor (geen
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
Australiè: Sommige mensen blijken veel gevoeliger voor radiofrequente straling mobieltjes.    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Berichten Internationaal

Australiè: Sommige mensen blijken veel gevoeliger voor radiofrequente straling mobieltjes.
vrijdag, 03 augustus 2012 - Dossier: Internationale berichten


Resultaten van de onderzoeksgroep van prof. Rodney Croft van de universiteit van Wollongong laten zien dat sommige mensen veel gevoeliger zijn voor de straling van mobieltjes (radiofrequente straling) dan anderen. De implicatie is dat studies waarbij door statistische correctie (zie Zwitsers Onderzoek) sommige subgroepen uitgesloten zijn in het verleden tot foutieve conclusies hebben geleid:

Bron: ABC Science 31 juli 2012

Could mobiles affect some more than others?

Auteur: Anna Salleh

The findings don't point to an effect on health per se raises questions about the reliability of previous research findings, say researchers.

Mobile phones affect the brainwaves of some individuals more than others, say researchers, who are calling for a rethink about how we study the effects of the pervasive technology.

Professor Rodney Croft, of the University of Wollongong, and colleagues, report their findings in the journal Bioelectromagnetics.

''The kind of studies that we do may be overlooking some problems,'' says Croft, who studies radiofrequency health effects.

Some studies have suggested that mobile phones can increase human electroencephalogram (EEG) activity during wake and sleep, says Croft.

But findings, including those made by Croft and colleagues in an NHRMC-funded study, have found that the increase in brainwave activity does not appear to have health effects.

''We found on average there was an increase but it was very small and there was no effect on sleep quality,'' says Croft.

But, Croft and colleagues did notice that the effect on the brainwaves was much greater in some people than in others.

They hypothesised that the averaging out of effects across the whole group was masking individual variability in sensitivity to mobile phone emissions.

''It could be that people are responding quite differently, with some people exhibiting no effect and others exhibiting a substantial effect,'' says Croft.
Follow-up study

To test if there were any individual differences in the effect of mobile phones on EEG and sleep, the researchers retrieved 20 volunteers who had been involved in their previous study and tested them again.

''The logic was that if there were individual differences, we'd find that those who had an effect the first time would have an effect the second time,'' says Croft. ''And those that didn't have an effect the first time wouldn't have an effect the second time.''

For two consecutive nights, volunteers were exposed for 30 minutes to a mobile phone, positioned in a cradle over the right temporal region, before going to sleep.

On one night the phone was continuously transmitting and on the other it was turned off - a so-called 'sham control'. The volunteers didn't know whether the phone was turned or not.

Brainwave monitoring during sleep showed, in keeping with previous findings, that exposure to mobile phones increased EEG activity during the first 30 minutes of non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep.

But what was most interesting was the increase was more prominent in those individuals who had shown an increase in the previous study, supporting Croft and colleagues' hypothesis.

''The response to mobile phones seems to be mediated by some kind of individual difference,'' says Croft.

While Croft and colleagues still found no impact on the quality of sleep, they say the findings question the reliability of previous studies, including those which have found no effect on EEG.

''Finding no effect or a very small effect could be the result of averaging people together. By looking at groups as a whole we may be missing important things,'' says Croft. ''It raises the question whether we can be as confident in past research as we have been.''

''Given the far-reaching implications of mobile phone research, we may need to rethink the interpretation of results and the manner in which research is conducted in this field,'' say Croft and colleagues.
Sensitive subgroup?

The research has been welcomed by Dr Edoardo Aromataris, of the The Joanna Briggs Institute, which assesses evidence for healthcare.

Aromataris says the study suggests that there could be a subgroup of people whose EEGs are predisposed to being effected by mobile phones.

''It might be a physiological difference, or it might be a psychological difference,'' he says. ''If this is true, all of what has gone before will be put to question.''

Aromataris says individual differences in physiology are already known to be very important. For example, it causes some individuals to be more sensitive to the effect of drugs than others, something that is often not discovered until after drugs are on the market.

He suggests it could be useful for researchers to eventually develop and test hypotheses about which subgroups of people are most sensitive to mobile phone impact on EEG.

''This is really how science progresses,'' says Aromataris. ''Croft and colleagues have seen something there that others haven't and that could potentially spin off research in another direction or it could not.''

Voor het originele artikel zie:
www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/07/31/3556674.htm .


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer