StopUMTS Logo
how to get rid of moles
Zoeken
   
Voorlichting
24/06/17ICNIRP Guidelines 1998 en
10/06/17Zonnepanelen: straling va
Artikelen
27/06/17COMPILATIE: Maatregelen v
27/06/1710 redenen om je iPhone w
27/06/175G communicatie – Voors
23/06/17EU-hof: Vaccin kan zie
20/06/17Overleg ECERI en WHO o
20/06/17Here's How Dirty Electric
Berichten Nederland
27/06/17Blauhús krijt foarearst
27/06/17Radygo vraagt patent aan
21/06/17Schippers: 2,5 miljoen eu
20/06/17Cijfers over kanker; Inci
20/06/17Smartphone op school: str
Berichten België
26/06/17Voorstel van resolutie vo
24/06/1740 procent van acht- en n
Berichten Internationaal
26/06/17WHO Radiofrequency Rad
11/06/17USA: 2 Ripon Children Dia
09/06/17Phonegate: French Gove
08/06/17Engeland: A Charity Could
Ervaringen | Appellen/oproepen
16/06/17GGD ervaring
07/06/17Vrouw zoekt veilige wonin
01/06/17Elana's pantry: ''The Gre
Onderzoeken
26/06/17136 Studies Showing Healt
02/06/17The Effect of RF Radiatio
27/05/17Diabetis 1: Radiation fro
Veel gestelde vragen
13/05/17Vakantie? Witte zo
10/07/16Zeven veel gestelde vrage
Juridische informatie
27/06/17Arrest van Europese Hof v
05/06/17Wireless Devices - Minimi
03/06/17Professor Belpomme in
Oproepen
12/06/17Lezing in Sommelsdijk (Go
10/06/17Lezing in Nijkerk over vo
19/05/17Lezing Straling en Gezond
Folders
10/04/17Brochures, folders, websi
29/04/16USA: Meer dan 50 tips voo
Briefwisselingen | Archief: 2008, 2005
14/06/17Mail naar 'De Monitor' na
09/06/17Letters From Doctors on W
Illustraties
 Algemeen
 Fotoalbum zendmasten
 Wetenschappelijke illustraties
India: Supreme Court shuts down mobile phone tower after man claims it caused cancer    
Ga naar overzicht berichten in: Berichten Internationaal

India: Supreme Court shuts down mobile phone tower after man claims it caused cancer
vrijdag, 14 april 2017 - Dossier: Internationale berichten


Bron 1: www.businesstoday.in/current/economy-politics/supreme-court-shut-down-mobile-phone-tower-cancer-cell-tower-radiations/story/249820.html
12 april 2017


Gwalior-based Harish Chand Tiwari could be the first person to convince Supreme Court of India to shut down a cell phone tower on the claims that the electromagnetic radiation from the tower had given him cancer.
According to a TOI report, 42-year-old Tiwari, who works as a domestic help at the residence of Prakash Sharma in the Dal Bazar area of Gwalior moved the Supreme Court against a BSNL tower 'illegally' installed on a neighbour's rooftop since 2002.

Tiwari said that the BSNL tower which was less than 50 metres from the house where he worked had exposed him to harmful radiation for the last 14 years. The exposure had led to Hodgkin's Lymphoma, claimed Tiwari.
In the order, a bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Navin Sinha said, ''We direct that the particular mobile tower shall be deactivated by BSNL within seven days from today.''

Last year, Minister of Information Technology Ravi Shankar Prasad had said that radiation emissions from mobile towers don't have adverse impact on human health and India should have more mobile towers to boost network.
''There is no scientific basis and truth stating that radiation from mobile towers and handsets causes adverse impact on human beings and animals. There are rumours all around the country that due to mobile towers, people will be suffering from cancers and other diseases but it is completely baseless and unfounded,'' Prasad had said.

Connecting the menace of call drops with lack of mobile phone towers Prasad had said, ''In dearth of mobile towers, there will be more call drops. Can we live without mobile phones? Can we afford to do that? If you don't want that to happen, please allow mobile towers to come up in your areas.''
''There is no impact on humans. There is no empirical evidence of any danger to human life because of all this. Even World Health Organization (WHO) after 30 years of studies has revealed there are no such threats,'' Prasad had said in the Lok Sabha last year.


Bron 2: www.thenewsminute.com/article/can-radiation-mobile-towers-cause-cancer-scientific-and-legal-debate-continues-60252
12 april 2017


The Supreme Court recently ordered deactivation of mobile tower after a cancer-stricken man said the radiation was responsible for his ill health.

In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court recently ordered in favour of a man who said that the radiation from a mobile tower had affected his health. According to Dhananjay Mahapatra’s report in TOI, Harish Chandra Tiwari has Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, a type of cancer, and he claimed that the harmful radiations from a mobile tower near his workplace affected him.
Not only did the court rule in Tiwari’s favour, the SC also asked for the tower to be deactivated in a week.

At a time when there is plenty of research about radiation and how it affects the human body -  and plenty that counters it -  the SC’s decision has thrown open the gate yet again for the debate on the health hazards posed by electromagnetic radiation of mobile towers.

While activists and some organisations have registered strong concerns about it, the government has continued to maintain that low Electro Magnetic Frequency (EMF) from mobile towers does not have adverse health consequences.

The debate
There are two types of radiation: ionizing and non-ionizing. The former kind is the category into which X-rays fall – these are harmful to the body and can cause cancer. Non-ionizing radiation on the other hand is a low energy radiation which generates heat. This is the category into which mobile tower radiation falls.

Over the years, there have been many studies refuting the connection between non-ionizing radiation given out by cell phone towers, and cancer. Oncologists have also said that these radiations are not carcinogenic, but not everyone from the science fraternity agrees.

For instance, Dariusz Leszczynski, a Finnish scientist on WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer’s (IARC) expert committee, said that long-term exposure to mobile phones and cell tower radiation - an average of 30 minutes per day for a decade - increases the risk of brain cancer.
WHO has also classified EMF radiation from mobiles, mobile towers and wi-fi as category 2(B), or possibly carcinogenic.

According to Malini Bhupta's report in Business Standard, the safety standards followed in India are 10 times more stringent than a majority of the world's countries. Mobile handsets emitting over 1.6 watt/kilogram radiation are not allowed in India. This limit is called the Specific Absorption Rate or SAR.
But like Tiwari, other individuals have also alleged that exposure to cell phone towers has had serious health consequences for them.

For instance, a Hindustan Times report from 2012 tells the story of a family in Jaipur. Two of its members were diagnosed with brain cancer, incidentally after three cell phone towers were erected in their neighbourhood.
Girish Kumar, a professor at IIT Bombay and one of the advocates of cell phone towers’ health hazards, had told HT then, “Being exposed to a mobile tower located within 50m of your home or workplace is like being in a microwave oven for 24 hours.”

Legally speaking
Tiwari’s case is not the first time that the matter has been taken up by the higher judiciary. Bollywood actor Juhi Chawla has been campaigning for a more stringent mobile tower policy for many years now. She and activist Prakash Munshi filed a PIL in the Bombay High Court in 2015 regarding increasing radiation levels as well as illegal towers across the country.
However, the HC said in November 2016 that there were no health hazards from mobile towers. Earlier in 2012 though, the Rajasthan High Court had held mobile towers as a health hazard, and asked operators in the state to remove towers in close proximity of hospitals, schools, colleges and playgrounds, or relocate them.

The matter moved to the Supreme Court where telecom operators challenged the Rajasthan High Court’s order. Speaking to Kalyan Parbat and Gulveen Aulakh for Economic Times, a spokesperson for the World Health Organisation (WHO) said in the regard that while the electromagnetic fields produced by mobile phones had been classified as “possibly carcinogenic”, there was no conclusive evidence to prove adverse health effects.

He conceded however that “lack of data on the impact of prolonged mobile phone use in excess of 15 years warrants further research.”
The Supreme Court ultimately upheld the Rajasthan High Court’s decision in June 2013.

However, concerns about the radiation from mobile phones and towers continued to be raised in the following years as well. Just last year, the apex court heard a “batch of appeals from various High Courts relating to erection of mobile towers in towns and cities.”

Counsel Prashant Bhushan had submitted that in cities like London, there were no cell phone towers – they were erected outside the city and boosters were used in the city. This wasn’t being done in India.

The CJI, one of the judges hearing the case, observed that a retired judge had said in his book that he used mobile phones for long hours, which could have been one of the reasons behind his cancer and subsequent death. However, the CJI also said that unless the lawyer could submit scientific proof about harmful effects of radiation from the mobile towers, the court could not pass an order against them. 

Bron 3: timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/health-bomb-ticks-but-experts-fail-to-connect-on-cancer-trigger-from-electromagnetic-fields/articleshow/58164485.cms .
13 april 2017

Health bomb ticks, but experts fail to connect on cancer trigger from electromagnetic fields

HYDERABAD: The Supreme Court's order on closure of a cell phone tower has kicked off a debate among health experts in Hyderabad on the impact of electromagnetic radiation on the health of people, animals and plants. Like their counterparts around the world, city doctors are also divided on whether or not cell phone towers cause cancers and other health issues.


Ga terug naar het hoofdmenu
Afdrukken | Vragen | RSS | Disclaimer